Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Analysis of the Causes of Failure, Associated Injuries and Clinical Results / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the causes of failure after a primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), associated injuries, and the clinical results of revision ACLR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study evaluated 46 patients (46 knees), who were followed at least two years after revision ACLR. The evaluations included the causes of failure after primary ACLR, associated injuries, 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee scores, Lachman test, Pivot shift test, and KT-1000 arthrometer measurement. RESULTS: The most common cause of failure was trauma (27 patients, 58.7%) and 19 failures (19 patients, 41.3%) were caused using an inappropriate surgical technique. The associated injuries were meniscus tears in 29 cases (63.0%) and articular cartilage injuries of Outerbridge grade II to IV in 19 cases (41.3%). The IKDC scores, Lachman test, Pivot shift test, and KT-1000 arthrometer measurements were improved significantly at the final follow-up. CONCLUSION: The most common cause of failure after primary ACLR was trauma. One stage revision ACLR resulted in relatively satisfactory stability but less satisfactory clinical function than the primary reconstruction, as reported previously, which is believed to be due to the more associated injuries.

Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis Using a Screw Compression Method for Treatment of Humeral Shaft Fractures

BACKGROUND: This study aims to compare the surgical outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) using a screw compression method in simple humeral shaft fractures. METHODS: This retrospective study was performed with 50 patients who had surgical interventions for the treatment of simple humeral shaft fractures and had follow-ups of at least 12 months in Ulsan University Hospital between August 2008 and June 2015. Group 1 included 23 patients treated with ORIF and group 2 included 27 patients treated with the MIPO technique using a locking screw plate. The time to clinical/radiographic union, the joint range of motion (ROM), and function were evaluated. RESULTS: The average time to clinical/radiographic bone union was shorter in group 2 (12.0 ± 3.7 weeks/14.8 ± 2.0 weeks in group 1 and 9.4 ± 1.3 weeks/12.0 ± 3.3 weeks in group 2; p = 0.022/p = 0.034). Shoulder and elbow joint function evaluated by joint ROM and visual analogue scale (VAS), Korean Shoulder Elbow Society (KSS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) scores was excellent in both groups. On the average shoulder ROM at 12 months after the operation, group 1 had forward elevation of 160°, external rotation of 30° in adduction and lumbar vertebra 10 level in internal rotation and group 2 had forward elevation of 170°, external rotation of 35° in adduction and lumbar vertebra 9 level in internal rotation. The mean VAS, KSS, ASES, and UCLA scores were 2.8, 87.0 ± 0.9, 89.4 ± 0.9, and 31.0 ± 1.4, respectively, in group 1 and 1.7, 89.1 ± 2.7, 91.0 ± 1.6, and 32.4 ± 3.2, respectively, in group 2. There were statistically significant intergroup differences in VAS score (p = 0.011). There were significantly less postoperative infections in group 2 (three cases, 10.7% in group 1 and 0 case in group 2; p = 0.041) although all of them were superficial infections and well-treated by an average 4-week course of antibiotics (range, 2 to 6 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: MIPO using a screw compression method in simple humeral shaft fractures demonstrated superior efficacy to ORIF in terms of the time to clinical/radiographic union, pain score, and postoperative infection rate.